Task Response Bands

Band	Description
9	The task is fully addressed with a clear, well-developed position. Ideas are relevant, well-supported, and explored in depth, with minimal lapses in content.
8	The task is fully addressed with a clear and well-developed position. Ideas are relevant, extended, and well-supported, though occasional lapses in content may occur.
7	The response effectively addresses the task with clear, well-developed ideas, though some over-generalizations slightly impact clarity. The tone is consistent, with minimal lapses.
6	The response addresses the prompt, but some areas lack clarity or detail. The position is clear, though conclusions may be unclear or repetitive. Some ideas lack development, with minor inaccuracies, and the tone is mostly appropriate with slight inconsistencies.
5	The response addresses the task, but some areas lack detail or clarity. The position is unclear at times, and ideas are insufficiently developed. There are irrelevant or inaccurate details, and the tone may fluctuate with repetition.
4	The response partially addresses the prompt, with unclear position and poorly developed ideas. There is significant repetition, irrelevant details, and some parts of the task are unaddressed. The tone is inconsistent.
3	The response fails to address the task, with irrelevant, repetitive ideas and no clear position. The content is minimal and underdeveloped, impacting effectiveness.
2	The content is loosely related to the prompt, with no clear position or developed ideas, and lacks relevance to the task.
1	The response is extremely limited, unrelated to the task, and lacks a clear position or relevant ideas.
0	The submission shows no evidence of task completion and lacks an understanding of the requirements. No attempt is made to address the task.